I found an analysis written on one of my favorite albums, Room Noises by a band called Eisley. The author of the analysis goes through the trouble of actually writing it so that people interested in purchasing the album can see someone else’s opinion on it. The author starts his analysis by first introducing the band and describing a little bit about them. Then he goes on saying what aspects of this album are unique and why it is good. He also talks about how the album might be lacking in certain aspects. The author ends his analysis with his thesis, which basically states that even though the album may take some listeners some time to fully appreciate and love, it is still a great album.
The analysis I used was written by David Sprague from this website:
http://music.barnesandnoble.com/search/product.asp?WRK=9318204
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I think this author went about this analysis in a really good way. It is always good to address counter arguments and admit to things that audiences would have questions about. It really endears you to your audience. I liked how he said ya it may take some getting used to but you'll like it, as opposed to you'll love this, even though not everyone will.
I agree with the way the author reviewed the album. Many times the authors of reviews will only feel strongly towards one side. The fact that he argued for both sides will catch the reader's attention.
I find it interesting that most reviews follow a general pattern. They begin with a synopsis of the subject. It moves into the "good and bad" section. Finally they end with their own interpretation of the subject and a recommendation.
Kyle, that is so true. Haha, I never really realized that before, but now that you say that, I can totally see it. Reviews generally do follow that pattern. Which is fine with me. I think it is usually really effective. People wanting to know more about something are going to want a little background, want to know what is good and bad, and of course hear the author's final thoughts.
I think the author's review on the album was a fair one. It didn't focus on the flaws, as most critics would, but took a more general approach to the analysis.
Post a Comment